The direct democracy of Switzerland leads sometimes abstruse excesses. Right of referendum and initiative in honor, but when it comes back to voting as this weekend with the "Minaret" initiative, I would be better if certain people the right of initiative would denied.
.
the non-Swiss is explained briefly that the minaret initiative has the goal of the construction of minarets by Vefassungsverbot (!) To stop. A constitution, religious freedom stipulated in a state which has a long liberal tradition, and it executed just introduced thanks to the Multikulturalitaet only there, in which he now stands.
.
It is the initiators and supporters of the initiative is not primarily a question of preventing the construction of minarets, but clearly the immigration policies as such. I am all for a tough stance this respect. Those who do not adapt can or wants to have to leave the country at the slightest offense, no ifs and buts. A minaret ban but hardly leads to a better integration, does not prevent forced marriages, the Auslaenderkriminalitiaet diminish one iota, and also decried the SVP specter of Sharia law are not addressed Inititaive. If I have the first high bills, and the initiative will actually adopted (almost certainly with a deep Röschtigraben ...), one will perceive the result in Innenverhaeltnis of Muslim citizens, and outside of Muslim countries as an insult and an affront.
.
A particularly bitter taste for me again the propaganda of Erzkonservationen church representatives from the EPP and EDU. I shall run cold down my spine when I hear these statements Parteiexponten. Why there are almost always strictly faithful to Erzkkonservativen and show the least tolerance ...
(currently have problems with the formatting here ... sorry) distributed
0 comments:
Post a Comment